Coyote Blog

When I use the word capitalism I talk about competition in a free market, not government regulated markets where legislators bail out big business and make taxpayers and consumers pay for their errors. People who support real capitalism opposed the bailouts that you supported. They oppose the tariffs that protect Big Sugar, Big Agriculture, Big Steel, etc. They oppose the labour legislation that prevents people with low skills from accepting jobs that would allow them to prove their reliability and ability.

Note that people who support free markets tend to be libertarians or anarchists. They care about liberty and oppose the rule of the few. The rule of the few is the game of socialists and conservatives.

Like I said, I will always know where you are. Why, first Disqus will tell on you because everytime you post to me it thinks we are in some kind of worthwhile conversation. It would be a snap if I were following you, but it is hardly necessary.. So, even if you do block your profile you won't escape.

Second, you always go to troll blogs that have science that you hate. Like a geoscientist like me would be a stranger.

But the third is by far the most hilarious. You can't keep your foul, lying mouth shut. Everytime you badmouth me it goes right into my inbox. Just like mine do yours. Of course, you are just so special, how could that be allowed to happen? LMAO!

IF you want peace, then lay off. I bet you can't.

No, when considering you, it is how stoopid. I am just here to demonstrate that you do not have some kind of magical free pass to troll and harass.

If I don't know, then what were you doing trolling pro-truth sites for over a year?

Any time someone who uses Disqus posts on some site you do not automatically get a notification unless you have been on the site and commented on commented on it. When you follow people all over the web you are a troll.

Oh yeah, where are the answers to my pertinent and on-topic questions. This blog should realize you waste all their bandwidth harassing, and never, ever do you actually participate in meaningful discussion.

Don't think you surprised me at all. We were taking bets, and I lost again. I picked Tuesday AM, and darn if you did not start back trolling tonight. At least I was smart enough to only risk $5.

Isn't that a rather stupid thing to say? You trolled much more truthful sites unmercifully. You trolled me endlessly because I successfully proved you were a greedy liar. Why am I here? I told you eVangeliar! I am demostrating to you that you are not special, you are not unique, and being an evil person can have consequences. Do you want me to publish your home address in Missisauga? You would do it to me in a heart beat, but you seem to think you are above the law, above all ethics, and are very, very special.

So, they ban me here? Who cares? I have just as much right to be here as you do. At least, I have one single-minded purpose . . . YOU. I am not here to engage others in destructive conversation, like you do, I am not here to offend every poster here, like you do, I am not here just to get the last word with every poster that comes here, and I am certainly not here to shut down this blog, like you always do.

In fact, it is ignorant to suggest your nonsense about this being a blog that opposes the "AGW myth." I have to roll on the floor laughing over that one. Ten minutes after I am gone, you WILL be picking a fight with one of the regular posters. It is what you do. You couldn't even stay with Czech fraud.

I read a number of sites and post when there is an article that I am interested in or a particular comment that I either disagree with strongly or support. That is what most people do. They do not follow others around the web as you have chosen to.

And note that I am a real person who publishes comments under his own name. I do not threaten people as you do because my concerns are with ideas, not personalities. Since you cannot support your ideas with either logic or fact it is not surprising that you have chosen to be more concerned with emotion and hand waving instead.

Mr. eVangeliar, I have got you thousands of times telling lies. I have enumerated them hundreds of times without response from you. When you do reply, you just repeat the same lies. As well, you literally hate anything normal people consider humane or decent. You always want to argue points that have no proof and no value.

You earned the name in spades. At least where what you bought with pride.

W. S. Byrd has said hundreds of times, but now the eVangeliar is plagiarizing his comments:

I read a number of sites and post when there is an article that I am interested in or a particular comment that I either disagree with strongly or support. That is what most people do. They do not follow others around the web as you have chosen to.

And note that I am a real person who publishes comments under his own name. I do not threaten people as you do because my concerns are with ideas, not personalities. Since you cannot support your ideas with either logic or
fact it is not surprising that you have chosen to be more concerned with emotion and hand waving instead.
---
Your stealing my original ideas is all the more humourous, as it has taken you over a year to actually figure this out.

1917 is not 1934.

If you are going to make up nonsense, then
you should make up something that sounds true, and confine yourself to
belaboring the gullible.

Saying something that you cannot support is just empty narrative.

Canada abandoned the gold standard in 1914. France was off the gold standard during World War I just like Germany and Britain. So was Australia, Italy, Turkey, Austria, and Russia. As I wrote before, the Classical Gold Standard was abandoned so that the European nations could have the war that was responsible for their decline. How can you discuss an issue if you are not familiar with even the basic facts?

You did not answer the question. In fact, you "suggest" some things that aren't facts at all, but you want to remain vague enough you can back-track you lie later.

And, if the "metal" standard is so important to you, oddly the economies of those nations could not withstand a war. Of course, like I said, you have already "suggested" falsehoods, so you lose again. Did you expect that "load" to get by?

What are you playing at by wasting these people's time and bandwidth? What are you trying to accomplish? Do you want me to broadcast interesting information to your multitude of enemis.

It is quite true that, you have too high an opinion of yourself my dim friend. I have no desire to drive you out of any conversation and do not worry about it because I can't control your motives or your stupidity. If you wish to be a troll by all means continue with your activities.

By definition, you are the troll. You always have been. I am not the one that idiotically restarts 3 month old discussions. I am not the one that restarts three day old conversations. I definitely am not the one that always hung around science blogs like some arse creep and spewed lies. I finally just started doing what you have been doing since you started in the blogs. But, the only one I am trolling is you.

And you sick pervert, I am not your friend. In fact, you use that because you are insulated from having any friends. Even the wack-jobs hate you after a few days of listening to you drone on and on.

You are a "real" person, and I am not. I post under my name, YOU DON'T. You hide your last name Vesovski. You equate with the Slavic NAZI collaborators..

The West went off the gold standard? Generally, for most nations that is untrue. Convertability was suspended to stop runs on the gold reserves. For most Western nations, this was just for the period of the war.

I did answer the question. The Classical Gold Standard ended in 1914. While the US kept its convertibility it was a part of the failed post-War gold exchange standard. Learn a bit before you post on the topic please.

I did?

Where? Please provide the exact quote and a link to it. I think that you have a reading comprehension problem.

How ironic that you post this on a site that has refuted your false claims regarding AGW over and over again. While the IPCC manipulation may work in some circles it does not do well on this site. If you want to argue about AGW you better bring something other than false claims of consensus.

You piece of filth, you go get the link. It exists and is easy to find, so do your own work. You prove everything I have ever said about your lack of honesty, because we both know that any link I provide will be ignored. You did it hundreds of times already.

On the second point, you are trying to take multiple positions and about the facts, all at the same time. And, unofficially is what I said. SO, your totally incomplete, and fake citation actually would support me.

YOU said 1914. YOU said, 1917 for the U.S. NO country actually went off the gold standard. NOW, you claim it was all unofficial. So thanks, you proved my point finally, and we are done with your nonsense.

I will point out that we had this same conversation about a year ago. At that time you claimed the Bank of Canada was not an authority.

My citation is still the same. This is easy as the truth remains very much the same, but a liar like you is constantly in need of new lies to cover the old ones.

You piece of filth, you go get the link. It exists and is easy to find, so do your own work.

While it is possible for me to have mistyped something or given the wrong impression you will note that my references clearly state that the US did suspend specie redemption while it was supposed to be and claimed to be on the Gold Standard. Please cite a link to support your claim. If you can't it is likely that you just failed to understand what you read as is typical of a know-it-all who is ignorant of the subjects that he is debating.

On the second point, you are trying to take multiple positions andabout the facts, all at the same time. And, unofficially is what I said. SO, your totally incomplete, and fake citation actually would support me.

If you were knowledgeable of the subject you would know that things are sometimes too complicated and not always black and white. For example, the US supposedly stayed on the Classical Gold Standard. But it suspended the Gold Standard in 1914 and violated it through an export prohibition in 1917 and 1918. Two positions can be taken and while they are conflicting we can easily support both with facts.

But note that some things are black and white and you happen to get those wrong. Canada, England, France, Germany, Austria, Russia, and the other countries made it clear that specie repayment would not be permitted because they went off the Classical Gold Standard to fight the war. Once the gold standard was ended it was dead. Even after the War, when countries tried to stabilize the monetary system, the Classical Gold Standard was never a possibility. They chose instead a less disciplined Gold Exchange Standard that was not very stable, created a massive boom in the late 1920s, and led to depression when the bubbles burst and the remedial action interfered with trade.

You really need to read a credible book or two on the subject. Probably the simplest and clearest for someone like you is Rothbard's, What Has Government Done to Our Money? My son read it when he was 14 and found it very useful. While you may not be as clever as he is you should still be able to follow the arguments. You can get the free digital copy at the links below.

http://tinyurl.com/on8u3ct (PDF version)

http://tinyurl.com/ne3hjqr (e-Pub version)

If the classical gold standard worked so well, why did it break down? It broke down because governments were entrusted with the task of keeping their monetary promises, of seeing to it that pounds, dollars, francs, etc., were always redeemable in gold as they and their controlled banking system had pledged. It was not gold that failed; it was the folly of trusting government to keep its promises. To wage the catastrophic war of World War I, each government had to inflate its own supply of paper and bank currency. So severe was this inflation that it was impossible for the warring governments to keep their pledges, and so they went “off the gold standard,” i.e., declared their own bankruptcy, shortly after entering the war. All except the United States, which entered the war late, and did not inflate the supply of dollars enough to endanger redeemability. But, apart from the United States, the world suffered what some economists now hail as the Nirvana of freely-fluctuating exchange rates (now called “dirty floats”), competitive devaluations, warring currency blocs, exchange controls, tariff s and quotas, and the breakdown of international trade and investment. The inflated pounds, francs, marks, etc., depreciated in relation to gold and the dollar; monetary chaos abounded throughout the world. In those days there were, happily, very few economists to hail this situation as the monetary ideal. It was generally recognized that Phase II was the threshold to international disaster, and politicians and economists looked around for ways to restore the stability and freedom of the classical gold standard.

Note that Rothbard does not consider the American failure to redeem specie payment as a default or going off the Gold Standard because redemptions in specie were restored after the War ended. Other sources clearly do not agree.

The government deviated from the gold standard shortly after the United States entered World War I. Large gold exports seemed to threaten the base of the monetary and credit structure. On 7 September and 12 October 1917, President Woodrow Wilson placed an embargo on exports of coin and bullion. These restrictions were removed in June 1919.

Note that this source does not even deal with the six month suspension in 1914 that the Fed paper covered.

YOU said 1914. YOU said, 1917 for the U.S. NO country actually went off the gold standard. NOW, you claim it was all unofficial. So thanks, you proved my point finally, and we are done with your nonsense.

No. All of the countries that were fighting actively were off the gold standard. That is clear no matter what source you look at. Even the US, which claimed to be on the gold standard would not permit the redemption of dollars into gold that could be removed from the country. As I said, read a book or two on the subject.

So you freely admit that you are merely an abusive, mentally unhinged
liar that feels the need to continue to belabor points that you have
proven yourself cannot be made.

There is nothing to discuss.
Continuing to bring this up again will not prove anything more than it
did the first time. Which was nothing.. It matters little whether this
blog whole-heartedly endorses you. You are just a waste of bandwidth
that wants to bully and troll, and I might add, break a number of the
"terms of service."

Please understand, once again I had a pool
going on how long it would take for you to start again. I lost, because
this time I guess to short. Of course, you are still a laughing stock
and a source of much amusement.

I understand that you post whatever lie that is convenient. You have continued to post my talking points as your own, then twist the obvious conclusions to be totally false.