Here Lies the Systematic Racism
I pretty much hate the term "systematic racism," which is a clever rebranding by the DEI folks of the Christian concept of "original sin." Try to tell the Church that you have behaved ethically? Doesn't matter, you still need us to remove the stain of your original sin. Try to tell the DEI trainer you don't have a racism problem? Doesn't matter how you act, you are part of the systematic racism.
I want to go on a brief (but typical of this blog) digression.
Years ago, probably in 2017 after the Charlottesville / proud boys kerfuffle, I had a Jewish friend express his concern about rising Right-wing antisemitism. He and I don't really talk politics much but my sense is that -- like many Jewish voters in the Northeast -- he is a reliable Democratic vote. I remember telling him that I really did not think the sort of knuckleheads at Charlottesville presented much of a threat. He asked me why.
I had to think about if for a minute -- I had a gut feel my statement was true but I had not really thought about it carefully enough to understand why. After pondering it for part of dinner I finally said that I didn't think the antisemites (and overt racists) on the Right were a threat because most of them were low-status. They did not have the power to do anything. It's not like they were hiring for Bank of America or on the admissions committee at Harvard. People with any sort of status or authority on the Right did not respect or follow these people (they might shill for their votes, but politicians of all stripes pander to the most absurd fringes of their part for votes). [Almost without thinking about it I said that if I were he, I would be more worried about antisemitism from the Left, because the folks in the BDS movement (for example) on universities are just the opposite of antisemites on the Right -- they are among the elite. I seldom am very prescient on cultural trends, but at the time I was very involved with the issue of discrimination against Asians at Princeton, and I thought I saw some parallels with Jews. I think we have all seen the explosion of antisemitism that has come out of the mainly Leftish elite over the last year].
When I grew up in the South in the 1960s and 1970s, racism was overt. Things began to improve remarkably in the by 1980, though I remember at that point my dad could not get the Exxon CFO into our country club because he was Jewish and there was pushback when George Forman tried to buy a house in tony River Oaks. By 2000, a generation later, much of that crap was gone, or at least way better. But they key change that should have made these changes sustainable was that racism was not only isolated to lower-status groups, but it became seen as a marker for being low-status. Demonstrating racism became the reverse of virtue-signaling -- it marked one as a loser.
If there is such a thing as systematic racism, then it has to be perpetrated by people who are part of the system. People like the proud boys are outsiders -- I guarantee they are not on any country club membership committees. They are not determining Ivy League admissions. They are not hiring at Goldman Sachs.
I do think the system goes wrong for blacks but it is not in any arena controlled by the proud boys. And I have a strong opinion on where that system failure lies: K through 12 education, and probably even more specifically K-5 education. We have affirmative action in the workplace for blacks. Why? Because there do not seem to be enough prepared candidates so we give less-prepared candidates a leg up. Before that we have affirmative action in college for blacks. Why? Because there do not seem to be enough prepared candidates so we give less-prepared candidates a leg up. We keep changing the SAT test. Why? Because blacks historically struggle to score as well as whites and other races on the test. We keep changing (lowering) high school graduation requirements. Why? Because to many black children fail to graduate with the higher standards.
All of this stuff are after-the-fact attempted work-arounds that avoid fixing the real problem: K-12 education is totally failing black kids. Any root cause failure analysis would get to this conclusion. You want to say that systematic racism exists? Well here is the place where the system is totally failing one race. If I were more of an expert, I could probably tell you which grade it is where things go off the rails but my guess is that it is an early grade where reading and basic math are not getting taught.
If I were the biggest racist in history and wanted to come up with a Dr Evil scheme to destroy blacks in America, I could not come up with a better plan than the K-12 education system, particularly in many large cities. So here lies systematic racism, right?
Well, here lies the systematic failure to help African-Americans towards prosperity. But it is hard to call it racism when in most of these cities the entire school board, the city council, and the mayor are all black or mostly black. Here is the school board in E. St Louis -- not many proud boys there. Here it is in Chicago. Both of these districts are lavishly funded -- East St Louis spends over $25,000 per student and has a 12:1 teacher ratio (the national average is about $18,000 per pupil and 14:1). The student body is 96% black and US News report that in E. St Louis "4% of high school students tested at or above the proficient level for reading, and 7% tested at or above that level for math." Well no surprise that Blacks are struggling when freaking 96% of them graduate from public school systems like this without being able to read. No affirmative action plan ever invented is going to magically create a future for adults who can't read or do math.
This is a f*cking crime, and it has nothing to do with racism or funding. Trump can make headlines getting rid of DEI programs -- fine, they were a fix for this problem that was never going to work. But until we seriously talk about public school education, we are not serious about fixing the systematic problems blacks face. And the system is going to fight back hard. Already folks in the system are telling us that the testing that shows blacks doing poorly should be eliminated. Why? Well they say it is to help blacks but that can't possibly be true. Its like telling me that I am better off not getting a cancer test and finding out I have cancer. The push to eliminate testing is a push to cover up this absolute tragedy by the insiders who are a part of it.
Anyone think there are some smart people out there with access to capital that could provide a better education privately for $25,000** a year in a school choice system?
** Postscript: $25,000 is an average. Typically in most school systems elementary school costs might be half the average and high school 150-200% of the average.
I agree totally. I find it interesting what people will riot over and what they won't. I guess it is a stable system. They are doing everything to reinforce the American Renaissance perspective. I think Bush said as the "soft bigotry of low expectations."
"The use of standardized I.Q. tests for Blacks has been banned in California State schools. "
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ368279
https://www.newsnationnow.com/on-balance-with-leland-vittert/oregon-cancels-math-reading-tests-harmed-students-color/
https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/07/20060720.html
There are certainly problems with the education system, most obviously in poor and heavily minority districts. But you seem to assume that all the failings of poor students are caused by incompetent teachers (or administrators, or whatever). Your children went to a fine private school in Phoenix, and I'm sure they and all their classmates did very well. If they had been transferred en masse to South Central LA, and the South Central kids transferred to your school, what would have happened? Would your children and their peers have failed to learn reading and math? Would the South Central kids have aced their SATs and gone on to selective colleges?
Schools have limited ability to overcome the other influences that affect children. Some of the things that have been done in the name of helping black kids have been bad: I'm thinking of ethno-centric instruction, relaxation of standards for discipline, elimination of requirements for subject matter mastery before progressing to the next grade. Certainly, public school systems are run more for the benefit of the adults than the students. Administrative bloat in public schools is as bad, and as wasteful, as it is in elite colleges.
Some programs, like the KIPP schools, and Success Academy, do seem to get better results, but there may be a selection bias in that they attract students from families who are committed to their children's success, and that they avoid some special needs students. It's not clear that these programs can be widely replicated or scaled.
You have hit both nails on the head. The old racism we knew from 50 years ago is now bifurcated and the ultra-left are some of the most racist people on the planet while some of the low status lowest economic level are adherents of the right wing. If we had an enemy take over our country and design a system to thoroughly destroy and demoralize our students it could not do worse then what the Public Education System has done to us. The reasons the schools are failing are legion but the common mistake some make is to attribute the blame to one thing or another. It is not one thing or another, it is all of them. Mainstreaming the lowest denominator is mandatory, individual education plans for 75% of the students, very bad teachers, parents who cannot themselves read or write don't care about their kids and once they're out of the 3rd grade it's all over because they did not learn to read and now never will.
I live across the street from an elementary school and I see ALL the kids showing up bright-eyed and cheerful and it kills me to see that somehow fades away as they spend more years in schools.
I think you mean systemic rather than systematic.