Cui Bono?

Here is something I didn't know:  Way back in the 1990's, Enron was lobbying hard for cap and trade legislation to create a lucrative new trading profit center for the company (HT Tom Nelson)

In the early 1990s Enron had helped establish the market for, and
became the major trader in, EPA's $20 billion-per-year sulphur dioxide
cap-and-trade program, the forerunner of today's proposed carbon credit
trade. This commodity exchange of emission allowances caused Enron's
stock to rapidly rise.

Then came the inevitable question, what
next? How about a carbon dioxide cap-and-trade program? The problem was
that CO2 is not a pollutant, and therefore the EPA had no authority to
cap its emission. Al Gore took office in 1993 and almost immediately
became infatuated with the idea of an international environmental
regulatory regime. He led a U.S. initiative to review new projects
around the world and issue "˜credits' of so many tons of annual CO2
emission reduction. Under law a tradeable system was required, which
was exactly what Enron also wanted because they were already trading
pollutant credits.

Thence Enron vigorously lobbied Clinton and
Congress, seeking EPA regulatory authority over CO2. From 1994 to 1996,
the Enron Foundation contributed nearly $1 million dollars - $990,000 -
to the Nature Conservancy, whose Climate Change Project promotes global
warming theories. Enron philanthropists lavished almost $1.5 million on
environmental groups that support international energy controls to
"reduce" global warming. Executives at Enron worked closely with the
Clinton administration to help create a scaremongering climate science
environment because the company believed the treaty could provide it
with a monstrous financial windfall. The plan was that once the problem
was in place the solution would be trotted out.

With Enron out of the picture, the way is clear for new players to dominate this multi-billion dollar new business.  And look who is ready to take over from Enron:

The investment
vehicle headed by Al Gore has closed a new $683m fund to invest in
early-stage environmental companies and has mounted a robust defence of
green investing.

The Climate Solutions Fund will be one of the biggest in the growing market for investment funds with an environmental slant.

The fund
will be focused on equity investments in small companies in four
sectors: renewable energy; energy efficiency technologies; energy from
biofuels and biomass; and the carbon trading markets.

This is
the second fund from Generation Investment Management, chaired by the
former vice-president of the US and managed by David Blood, former head
of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

The first, the Global Equity
Strategy Fund, has $2.2bn invested in large companies the company
judges have "sustainable" businesses, from an environmental, social and
economic viewpoint. Mr Blood said he expected that fund to be worth
$5bn within two years, based on commitments from interested investors.

Going green indeed.

6 Comments

  1. Bearster:

    Warren, haven't you said that you donate money to the Nature Conservancy? I presume you will stop now?

    This article doesn't even ask the question: is it proper to deliberately keep land (or other resources) out of productive use?

  2. John Moore:

    Dr. Bob Balling is a former Arizona State Climatologist, professor at ASU, and well known climate skeptic (2 popular books).

    He had (has?) a consulting practice and approached Enron to see if they wanted his services on climate issues. They brushed him off, saying that they didn't want to fight the climate alarmists because of money they would make in the cap and trade markets.

  3. Bob Smith:

    Rent-seekers all.

  4. Mike:

    What's unfortunate is how many people blame the Bush administration for disasters like Enron.

  5. Ian Lippert:

    Does anyone have any more reliable links? This is an interesting story, but its a link to a link to a poorly written web page. Since this is bordering on conspiracy theory I would need a better source before I'd start telling people I know about this.

  6. TC:

    I won't vouch for the reliability but I find these interesting.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1813229/posts

    and

    http://cei.org/gencon/019,02898.cfm