June 24, 2014, 1:38 pm
I read this today in our local paper. It is written by a local police sergeant and is entitled "Safety tips: How to talk to an officer if you're pulled over"
First, be polite. No good will come of the situation if you are immediately argumentative or uncooperative. Tell your passengers to do the same. You may not agree with the reason for the stop or the outcome, but the side of the road is not the place to debate this. If issued a ticket, you will have your time in court to present your case to a judge or hearing officer....
Do not address the officer with any slang terms or comments. Treat the officer as you would like to be treated, with respect.
Being polite is a nice thing to do. But no one would write a "safety tip" article about being polite to your Starbuck's server. Everyone knows the above guidelines are good safety tips (though Chris Rock said it better), but no one mentions the real elephant in the room: That if you are not polite or not obeisant or somehow "disrespect" an officer, he may well arrest you on a trumped up charge or even physically abuse you. The stories of this are ubiquitous, and everyone has heard them. Essentially, the officer writing this is saying to the rest of us that "beware, some police officers are thin-skinned, short-tempered jerks and will abuse you if you do not kowtow to them like some Mandarin emperor."
I guess there is something to be said for the truth in advertising here. Next week I suppose the DMV will write an article on getting a drivers license that emphasizes bringing a book because their process is so slow and horrible that you are likely to be there all day.
December 15, 2009, 12:45 pm
The police are very good at enforcing their own version of the facts after an encounter with citizens goes wrong. It is only the advent of the inexpensive digital camera that has started to save folks from the police's ability to make up a story and stick to it when they screw up. In fact, I am constantly amazed at how long the police will often hold on to their story even in the face of video evidence.
So after reading stories like this one, I am strongly considering buying myself a Flip camcorder or something similar and just tossing it into my car. Of course the downside is, as documented by Carlos Miller, there is nothing guaranteed to enrage your average law enforcement officer than filming his or her actions in public.
Related, here is a good video: 10 Rules for Dealing with the Police.
And on a lighter note, here is some classic Chris Rock on the same topic.
February 28, 2005, 2:52 pm
Maybe it was just having really low expectations, but I thought Rock was OK last night, though conservative bloggers seemed to have hated the broadcast. Sure some of the stuff they did flopped (the skit with Adam Sandler comes to mind) but he was moderately funny and while he made fun of a number of people, he was pretty equal-opportunity about it. And anyone who gets Sean Penn all huffy can't be all bad. Sure the show may have less gravitas than when Carson hosted it, but compare it to where shows like the Grammy's have gone and it looks like Masterpiece Theater. And if people want to talk about whether Rock was "serious" enough for the event, they should focus some attention on Al Pacino showing up looking like a homeless person or on Dustin Hoffman trying to present the Best Picture award drunk off his ass.
Other Notes:
- Was the show producer sleeping with Beyoncé, or was she the only singer available? Why did we see her three times? And did all of the songs seem to be totally unmemorable or what?
- The women's dresses were generally awsome, while their hair generally looked awful (or at least just dull, which is the same for a Hollywood-type). I loved the return of those sort-of mermaid-shaped dresses.
- Jamie Foxx was the highlight
- Seeing Clint Eastwood with his young wife was an inspiration for all of us over-40 males. Seeing his mom there was even more of an inspiration.