It's Not Just About Money, It's About Class
I still think my first reaction to the Left's pushback on DOGE's probe of the spending of USAID and later other government departments was on target:
Which led to this meme (it's an old standby but under @boriquagato
influence I am dipping my toe into meme creation:

As an aside, I am fully supportive of addressing real privacy abuses found in the DOGE process, though having these concerns come from the party and the media complex that spent the last four years trying to leak Donald Trump's and other rich people's tax returns and whose first response to these privacy concerns was to dox members of Musk's analytical crew makes me skeptical this is the real concern. For government workers, "privacy" means keeping secret bad or stupid decisions. Remember this one (which was again about covering up spending)?
Some of the questionable redactions, by contrast, are charming efforts at bureaucratic butt-covering. Lisa Page, for example, was discussing with Peter Strzok the challenge of having an intimate meeting in Andrew McCabe’s conference room, given the size of his grand new conference table. “No way to change the room,” Page texts in the version provided by Justice. “The table alone was [REDACTED]. (You can’t repeat that!)” Hmmm, what classified, top-secret, national-security information could possibly have been redacted? The blacked out bit, it seems, was a simple “70k.” The DoJ—and can you blame them, really?—didn’t want Congress to know they were in the habit of spending $70,000 on a conference table.
Update 2-17: DOGE is seeking access to IRS systems with taxpayer data. As loath as I am to slow this effort down, I think we need to hear about some strong controls before this proceeds.
But having thought about this longer, I think this is about more than just money. It is also about class. Just listen to how the cool kids in the media talk about Musk's group of young weirdly-nicknamed geeks. This is fairly typical:
He was speaking specifically about a Trump executive order that decrees that the Department for Government Efficiency can force federal agencies into firing four people for every new hire. “Who the hell voted for Mr. Musk?” Begala raged. “Who the hell voted for—excuse the phrase—a guy who calls himself Big Balls? A 19-year-old kid going in there and trying to fire cancer researchers and scientists and teachers and agricultural specialists. It’s, it’s appalling.”
This is moderately hilarious from a) a party who still has not told us which unelected people really were making decisions behind the curtain for a senile Joe Biden; and b) an individual (Begala) who wielded immense power and influence across all departments of the Clinton Administration. The department staffs in DC are 99.99% people who are both unelected and unconfirmed by Congress. The issue is not that they are unelected, the issue is that they are "the wrong sort." I am reminded of the British aristocracy in the 19th century that would tolerate almost any sort of governmental incompetence or malfeasance as long as the people were "the right sort" -- meaning of their class.
The mention of Victorian England reminds me of another way that class is likely involved here. In the English aristocracy the oldest son inherited the title and often all the land and income (which was entailed to the title). This left little for any additional sons, so an income had to be found somewhere for them in a profession that did not require them to sully themselves with "trade" (daughters were handled a different way, through the marriage market). Reading for the law was an acceptable profession for a son with brains, and the army or navy were outlets for many. But most families needed a way for their sons without too much brains or ability and not militarily inclined to make a living. A position in the Church was often the solution.
Modern American blue-blood parents are no different -- they need a way to secure a living for their kids who won't or can't land a job in the modern elite career choices (law, consulting, investment banking, or a sexy startup). Unlike in Victorian times, the military or the Church are no longer preferred elite options? So what to do with your 22-year-old gender studies major? The parents need her to get an income and they need her to do it in a context that they can proudly report to their friends -- Paul Begala does not want to tell his friends that his son's job is maintaining distributor pricing lists ** (anyone who does not believe the latter criteria should have been at my Princeton or Harvard Business School 25th reunions).
The solution? Get them a job at a non-profit, the modern American version of going to the Church. As Arnold Kling noted once, non-profits tend to have much higher status than do for-profits. And without competition they don't have to carry the same performance standards as for-profits. And they are incredibly susceptible to trading a position for your kid in exchange for a nice donation.
The employment rosters of non-profits and NGO's are stuffed with the children of privilege. So much so that there are many non-profits that seem to do nothing EXCEPT employ and pay the travel expenses of 20-something kids from rich and/or influential families. I have been writing about the non-profit scam for years. As I wrote then:
From my direct experience, I would go further. There is a tranche (I don't know how large) of non-profits that are close to outright scams, providing most of their benefits to their managers and employees rather to anyone outside the organization. These benefits include 1) a salary with few performance expectations; 2) expense-paid parties and travel; 3) myriad virtue-signalling opportunities; 4) opportunities to build personal networks. This isn't just criticizing theoretical institutions -- people I know are in such jobs in these organizations.
The spending that DOGE is going after at USAID and other departments likely threatens the income of a number of under-qualified elite kids. So I will update my meme:

**Footnote: I will proudly tell the world that my son's first job out of college was indeed maintaining distributor pricing lists for Ballast Point beer. Trying to optimize profits across the matrix 100+ sku's and scores of distributors is a great real world skill building entry-level job that so many of the change-the-world-before-I-am-25 college kids currently eschew.
Postscript: If you want the blank template for the Astronaut meme updated for DOGE, I share it here.
This post is rich in material, and brings several thoughts to mind.
First, and most prominently, I am gobsmacked by the immensity of our elites' (especially the ones running the government) lack of seriousness - this applies to the elites of all the rich countries. They perceive an existential threat from climate change, so they spend hundreds of billions trying to build an electrical system that does not rely on fossil fuels, while giving no thought to measures that might mitigate the effects of climate change. They imagine that their sheer will can lead to a carbon-free economy, and that the rest of the world will embrace their vision rather than try to build a more prosperous future for their children.
They perceive a world of military threats from Russia and China, and devote their attention to reducing the size and effectiveness of their own militaries. The United Kingdom has 22 warships, only about half of which are available for active service. The US has 295 ships, of which 236 are currently in port. How many could be deployed with a month or two if needed is not readily available; it's probably a secret. When NATO was worried about Russia invading NATO members Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia back in 2014, Germany (the premier land force of Europe) had 40 operational tanks, but would have required months to deploy them to Lithuania because they had exactly 3 rail cars that could carry tanks. When President Biden determined that Ukraine must be defended, he did it by drawing down US ammunition stocks to levels that will take 10 years to rebuild, assuming we're willing to spend the money.
They perceive problems with too much racism in police, so their solution is to reduce the size of police forces, leaving poor communities more vulnerable to criminals, while encouraging rioters to wreck urban neighborhoods.
They note the evils inflicted on powerless indigenous peoples and respond with "land acknowledgements" that seem to require giving the land back to the indigenous, but of course they have no intention of doing any of that.
If I seem to be focusing on the unseriousness of the lefty elites, it's only because the right-side elites have no agenda at all.
Second, you note the role of nonprofits, which are almost exclusively part of the Left establishment. I'm reminded of a Kevin Drum column from 2011 (https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/03/defunding-left/), in which the writer laments Republicans' efforts to block funding (primarily public funding) for lefty organizations and causes, while noting the Democrats haven't done similar things to right-leaning causes and organizations. My reaction was that only left organizations rely on public funding channels, but Drum's audience rejected that proposition.
I would despair, except that I believe that the US still has the potential to dethrone the current elites. If we can find some competent people to pare back the government and re-focus on important priorities, we can recover. For now, or enemies and potential enemies are still weaker than we are, so the threat is not existential. But that may not be true much longer.
Seeing all of this getting exposed and the depth and blatancy of the grift is shocking. Of course I knew it was bad but this is barely getting started, and it's far beyond what I expected. And one can only wonder why this was tolerated for so long.
I think jobs at NGOs are less about finding jobs for kids ala Victorian England, and more about kids learning from the relentless way Non-Profits are exalted, and For-Profits denigrated, in "good" schools. I observed that at my children's private school; I would be surprised if it wasn't the same at Phoenix Country Day and Amherst.
A quick bit on all of the pearl clutching over DOGE having access to our sacred confidential data:
It's not that these low-level government databases have been repeatedly penetrated over the years by hackers; it's more like they've been endlessly gang-raped and bukkaki'd. There's nothing in there you can't buy in million-plus-record-quantities for a few hundred bucks on the dark web. That ship sailed 20 years ago.
If you want some real outrage over privacy invasions, search for the terms "NSA LOVEINT" (this was known in infosec circles for a long time, but Edward Snowden was kind enough to trade his ability to live as a free man for making it very public knowledge).