On Tribalism and Discourse -- The Best Paragraph I Have Read For Quite A While
Today on Twitter I sought to give our Senator Krysten Sinema some support for her opposition to tariffs (kudos for Donald Trump for working to turn Democrats into free traders, though to be fair Sinema herself has come a long way from her radical roots). I got this response:
i’ve diagnosed you with TDS, please contact your local medical professional for help
— University-4💭 (@UniversityFour) July 23, 2019
I wanted to write about what a non-sequitur this response appears to be, as it is completely unresponsive to the issues at hand. All the commenter is really saying is, "I notice you are not of my tribe."
But a detailed response on my part is unnecessary, given this awesome paragraph from Kevin Williamson:
Which brings us to the problem of trying to have a productive conversation with people who are caught up in the vast sprawling electronic apparatus of self-moronization. It does not matter what anybody actually has said or written. The rage-monkeys have an idea about what it is they want you to have said, or what people like you are supposed to think about x or y. I cannot count how many times I have had some person respond to something critical I’ve written about some lefty fruitcake with “What about Trump, huh?” When I point out that, among other things, I wrote a little book called The Case against Trump, the response is: “Well, Republicans . . .” And then when I point out that I am not one of those, either, the retreat into ever-vaguer generality continues incrementally. The fundamental problem is that what’s going on in “conversations” such as these is not conversation at all but a juvenile status-adjustment ritual. These people do not care about ideas — they care about who sits at which cafeteria table in the vast junior high school of American popular culture.
Gad, I wish I had written that last sentence.