Our Political Opponents Believe Whatever We Say They Believe
I can think of two groups with whom I have some sympathy -- the Tea Party and climate skeptics -- who share one problem in common: the media does not come to them to ask them what their positions are. The media instead goes to their opposition to ask what their positions are. In other words, the media asks global warming strong believers what the skeptic position is, without ever even talking to skeptics. It should be no surprise then that these groups get painted with straw men positions that frequently bear no resemblance to their actual beliefs.
Paul Krugman provides an excellent example. He writes: (shame on the blog author for not linking Krugman's article, here is the link)
Or we’re told that conservatives, the Tea Party in particular, oppose handouts because they believe in personal responsibility, in a society in which people must bear the consequences of their actions. Yet it’s hard to find angry Tea Party denunciations of huge Wall Street bailouts, of huge bonuses paid to executives who were saved from disaster by government backing and guarantees.
This is really outrageous. I am not a Tea Partier because they hold a number of positions (e.g. on immigration and gay marriage) opposite of mine. But to say they somehow have ignored cronyism and bailouts is just absurd. TARP was one of the instigations, if not the key instigation, for the Tea Party. As I have written any number of times, the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street actually shared a number of common complaints about bank bailouts and cronyism.
By the way, it is Hilarious to see Krugman trying to claim the moral high ground on Cronyism, as he has been such a vociferous proponent of the Fed balance sheet expansion, which will likely go down in history as one of the greatest crony giveaways to the rich in history.
Not sure about that. I have heard several speeches by The Bro's that sound extremely reasonable. I am sure they aren't perfect libertarians, but then none of us are.
Oh no, the tune has changed. Time for another song!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv5BYEOQYLo
""Polite society" of WHAT? Lunatics you know and talk to?"
Most likely, the voices in his head.
I did a Google search for "Perot Tea Party" and the top result was a WaPo article that actively discouraged people from conflating Perot's reform movement with the Tea Party movement.
I don't know the details on his loses. I'd be curious to know. Do you have any good sources? grax
You will have to ask rst1317 he made the claim. Though I think he speculatively purchased land in North Texas which he may have sold at a loss. I still suspect with how connections - even if there WS a loss or was quickly.covered for him by government.