Well, It's Good Princeton Is Against Gender Stereotyping, Because Otherwise This Would Be Pretty Obvious Gender Stereotyping
From the College Fix (my empahasis added):
Are young men at Princeton University violent, aggressive, hyper-masculine, stalkers, or rapists?
A new position at the Ivy League institution indicates campus officials apparently think enough of its male students grapple with such problems that it warrants hiring a certified clinician dedicated to combating them.
The university is in the process of hiring an “Interpersonal Violence Clinician and Men’s Engagement Manager†who will work with a campus office called SHARE that’s dedicated to “survivors†of sexual harassment, assault, dating violence and stalking.
According to SHARE, one in four female undergrads experienced such misconduct during the 2015-16 school year.
The men’s manager will also launch initiatives to challenge “gender stereotypes,†and expand the school’s Men’s Allied Voices for a Respectful and Inclusive Community, a self-described “violence prevention program†at Princeton that often bemoans “toxic masculinity†on its Facebook page.
According to the job description, the men’s manager will develop educational programs targeting the apparent “high-risk campus-based populations for primary prevention of interpersonal violence, including sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic/dating violence, and stalking.â€
The job posting implicitly refers to men as perpetrators and women as victims.
Fortunately, stereotyping does not count if done about men, whites, or heterosexuals so this is all OK.
By the way, apparently since the one in five statistic was not absurd enough, SJW's have upped the ante with a new one in four stat. I am all for aggressive responses to actual violence, and would be more harsh in its punishment than most universities (I would throw the perpetrator into the legal system, rather than merely some administrative punishment and expulsion regime.) The problem is that I do not know the actual rate of violence. The one in five, and now one in four stat is almost certainly bullsh*t. If this were really true, college campuses would be more dangerous than Syria and people would not be competing so hard and paying so much to send their daughters there.
The problem with these stats is that they hoover up all sorts of complaints by women that range from true violence down to things like boorish comments by males and post-sex regret. By rhetorical slight of hand, all these complaints are morphed into violence and every complaint, no matter how trivial, is essentially counted as a rape. Perhaps sexual assault on campus is indeed more common than in the broader community, but if so I would like to see real statistics. When advocates purposely inflate and obfuscate their core statistic, it makes me suspicious that the actual number is not really that bad and therefore a fake one needs to be provided instead for the activist to get my attention. But for me, this has the opposite effect, turning me off on an issue I perhaps should be energized about because I can't see past the fakery.
