Why Remove Hamilton Instead of Jackson?
Apparently, it is Hamilton that will get the ax on the $10 bill rather than Jackson on the $20 in order to make way for some fresh historical faces. I am not the biggest Hamilton supporter in the world, and he was never a President, but he had as much to do with the form our Constitution takes today as any man in history. On the other hand, for whatever points Jackson might make with me by opposing the Bank of the United States, he was really a horrible person. His attitude about blacks and his treatment of slaves represented the worst of the slave-holding South, his his ruthless role in wiping out of the Cherokee nation is beyond criminal.
To this day, I don't know how the conflict between nomadic Native Americans and European settlers looking to build towns and farms could ever have had a happy ending. But the one exception to this was the Cherokee, who settled down in communities in Georgia that in most ways mirrored European communities in the rest of the early United States. If there are any native americans we should have been able to integrate into American society, it was the Cherokee. And we wiped them out. Awful. I would rather the $20 bill be blank than have that genocidal maniac on it.
PS- would love to see someone like Harriet Tubman on the money, or really anyone else whose contribution did not consist merely of exercising power over me. Hell, put Steve Jobs on there -- the iPad, and the Apple II before it, have improved my happiness more than any politician.
You were actively harassing me with your usual arsenal of lies.
You still are.
And, you are one stoopid troll. Really, you block that immaculate profile that you whined about so much, but doing so accomplishes nothing as you are too stoopid to quit trolling. Do you here me whine about my profile all the time? Oh, that is what the eVangeliar is for.
I checked, and you blocked your profile. ROTFLMAO! What good does
that do when I only respond to your trolling? You are too stoopid to
stop,, and I have explained the process of finding you dozens of times.
You can't quit trolling. So, what good does it do to block your
profile.
The fun part is, you keep whining and abusing me because
you elected for your profile to be public. Like I said, that is your
problem. But if you can never remain silent, then I will always know
where you are!
So, you are not only a lying hypocrite, but a
stoopid one at that. But, I am proud to see that you did that. Now,
that is one less set of lies you can tell.
No thinking was required. You were quite explicit. Like I said, you are one stoopid troll.
Anyone that argues for liberty does not speak as you do. You argue
for the complete freedom of the 0.3%.. If you actually get what you
want, then the 85-99.7% will rise up and destroy you.
Isn't it just a shame that you claim to be for freedom, but your politics and economic views are strictly right-wing elitist?
Like I said, you are one stooopid troll.
I checked, and you blocked your profile.
That I did, and any new postings that I make don't get 100 responses from you. Should have done it a long time ago. Most comments now are from intelligent and respective people who have something to say.
Actually, you need to learn how to think. And how to read. You often claim that I have said something that I never did because you could not understand what was clearly written. That is a common problem among ideologues who want to tell other people what they do because they have a false sense of security.
Anyone that argues for liberty does not speak as you do. You argue for the complete freedom of the 0.3%.. If you actually get what you want, then the 85-99.7% will rise up and destroy you.
You might actually want to pay attention my Marxist friend.
http://www.dissentmagazine.org/wp-content/files_mf/1353953160genovesethequestion.pdf
Anyone that argues for liberty does not speak as you do.. You argue for the complete freedom of the 0.3%.. If you actually get what you want, then the 85-99.7% will rise up and destroy you.
Isn't it just a shame that you claim to be for freedom, but your politics and economic views are strictly right-wing elitist?
Like I said, you are one stooopid troll.
eVangeliar, I have defeated with conviction, every lame argument you have come up with. Yet, you sole intention is to keep proving you are a bullying troll. It was not hard to defeat your arguments, because they were all about what the 98% can do for you, and how that would make you happy.
You prove my points with every continued, totally meaningless post.
Then, every attack you ever made against me, and every word you have ever said in complaint, were total lies.
eVangeliar, we both know that "comments now are from intelligent and respective people who have something to say," is a total lie. You woes started solely because you could not make "comments now are . . . intelligent and respective . . . . "
nimrod thing to say
another NR saying
forgive ws burp, he loops a lot
long runt, or rant nice pismire work
yer clapper is broke and your bell don't ring true.
what a pile, Pyle