Uber Is About To Become A Much Worse Place To Work
Here are some cool things about working for Uber:
- You can work any time you want, for as long as you want. You can work from 2-4 in the morning if you like, and if there are no customers, that is your risk
- You can work in any location you choose. You can park at your house and sit in your living room and take any jobs that come up, and then ignore new jobs until you get back home (I actually have a neighbor who is retired who does just this, he has driven me about 6 times now).
- The company has no productivity metrics or expectations. As long as your driver rating is good and you follow the rules, you are fine.
All of this is going to change. Why? Due to lawsuits in most countries that seek to redefine Uber drivers as employees rather than contractors. One such suit just succeeded in England:
Is Uber a taxi firm or a technology company, and are its drivers self-employed or mistreated employees? These questions are being asked of Uber the world over, and last year an employment tribunal case in the UK concluded two drivers were, in fact, entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and other benefits. The ride-hailing service contested this potentially precedent-setting decision, as you'd expect, but today Uber lost its appeal. In other words, the appeal tribunal upheld the original ruling that drivers should be classed as workers rather than self-employed.
The appeal tribunal agreed that when a driver is logged in and waiting for a job, that's still tantamount to "working time." Working time they aren't getting paid for, of course. Interestingly, the ruling also noted that Uber basically has a monopoly on private hire via an app. Therefore, drivers are beholden to them and can't reasonably engage in other work while also being at Uber's disposal.
GMB, the union for professional drivers that's behind the original case, is calling it "a landmark victory." Naturally, the law firm representing the GMB and Uber drivers feels much the same. No points for guessing who has a slightly different opinion.
Despite Engadget's usual economic ignorance that this must be all good for drivers, in fact this is going to destroy about everything that makes Uber attractive as compared to 9-5 office jobs. That is, if rulings like this don't kill the company entirely, as I have previously prophesied.
This is going to add a new cost for Uber, forcing them to pay money to drivers for dead time when they are not actually driving a passenger. Let's make the reasonable assumption that Uber's first response to this is to A) stay in business and B) attempt to keep prices to customers from rising. The only way they can do this is to minimize dead time.
Want to park at your house in an unpromising neighborhood with little business? Forget it, Uber can't allow that in the future. Want to work at an unproductive hour of your choosing? Forget it. Uber is going to have to set quotas on certain regions and hours of the day that are less productive and find a way to ban drivers from working those times. In addition, they are likely to institute some sort of productivity metric for drivers, ie something like revenue minutes as a percent of total, and then they are going to rank all the drivers and start cutting drivers from the bottom of the list. If Uber survives, it is going to be a very different company to work for, and is going to feel much more like a regular office job with a boss hanging around your cubicle pestering you about TPS reports.
