Yet Another Reason Why I Am Frustrated By the Libertarian Party
After years of enduring a procession of moonbats and losers running under the Libertarian Party banner, I am frustrated that the party can't produce a credible libertarian candidate I feel good about voting for. I wrote more on this here just before the election.
Now I see that the Libertarian Party is asking for a second recount in Ohio, after the first one changed the vote tally all of 300 or so votes out of a 100,000+ margin. The Party's candidate admits that the recount won't change the result:
They have said they don't expect to change the election results, but want to make sure that every vote is properly counted.
Then why the hell do it?!? And why the hell should we use government money to do it. And why why why the hell is the Libertarian Party, the party of not just small but minimal government, doing asking for this??
Thanks to Captains Quarters for the link. This "count every vote" thing confuses me. A scientist would laugh at you at the concept of error-less measurement. Every measurement and count has error - you just try to make the count or measurement error substantially smaller than the differential in votes. In the Washington governors race or in the Florida 2000 Presidential race, the differential was/is probably within the error bar. But certainly not in Ohio.
